Defensiveness, explaining, avoiding, and blaming are prevalent traits among men. It’s easy to spot because it is far from subtle, and that’s when they are easy – we can just see them, right in front of us. The next challenge comes when defensive behaviours are more subtle, and they require a very slow, and often painful, process of noticing them, usually by someone else.
Her shering becomes a mirror of his insecurities.
When a woman tells them how she feels, they will often get very defensive and even blame her in return. If a man’s heart is a bit softer or more insecure, they will likely go into explanation mode, trying to explain what happened and how they see things, all through logic and rational thinking, hoping the other side can see and understand it. This is where we, men, face the obstacle that is often impossible to get through – we don’t understand and are frequently left confused with “wtf just happened?”.
A boy says sorry when he has to. A man says sorry when he should. A true man says sorry even when he isn’t at fault…
because the relationship matters more than being right.
When things escalate, a man feels like their ego, self-worth, and character have been challenged. So many times I’ve heard stories of other men who actually used words like “I feel like if I don’t defend myself, it means I’m a pushover, and she will just walk all over me”. It’s the ego that is being hurt, the “manly man” inside who needs to be right and show how things are. Getting into the fight to protect their fragile self and believing that apologising means they admit everything is their fault. That easily translates to their inner world, undermining their already often low self-esteem.
The truth is that if someone is genuinely sharing their feelings with us, with good intent and mindfully, and we get reactive to that message, it is all on us. Nobody else, just us. It’s our reaction where we feel the message is not about her, but me. You have the power to avoid these dynamics, but you need to be aware of them first.
Why are we like that? Attachment psychology.
Something that often goes unnoticed is how men attach themselves to women, and how they are attached to themselves. A powerful layer beneath defensiveness and reactivity is attachment psychology. Most men are not taught to notice their emotional patterns, yet these patterns shape almost every conflict. Many men carry:
Dismissive-avoidant tendencies
Growing up with the message that emotions are “too much,” “irrelevant,” or “weak,” many men learned to disconnect from their inner world. In relationships, this shows up as shutting down, distancing, going logical, or getting overwhelmed when someone wants closeness. Her need for connection feels like pressure. Her emotional expression feels like a threat. His instinct becomes escape, numbness, or rationalising.
Shame-based self-esteem
A lot of men look confident on the outside but operate from deep shame on the inside. Shame says, “There is something wrong with me.” So when a woman shares her hurt, shame twists it into:
“I failed. I’m not enough. She sees the worst in me.”
Fear-of-failure schemas
Men often grow up with heavy expectations to perform, provide, protect, succeed and never make mistakes. When conflict arises, they don’t just hear “I’m upset.” They hear:
“You failed. You’re disappointing me. You’re not the man you should be.”
This internal pressure triggers a fight-or-flight response or a shutdown. A simple conversation becomes an existential evaluation.
What’s happening inside her?
While men often react from fear of failure or shame, women in these moments are usually experiencing something very different. Understanding her internal world is key to closing the gap. She is not “bitchy”, she just speaks a different language, even if the words sound familiar to us.
Need for attunement
She is not looking for solutions. She is checking whether you can meet her where she is emotionally. Attunement means you’re present, paying attention, and connected to her inner experience.
Desire to feel understood
When she shares what hurt, she wants to know you get it. Not agree with every detail, but understand the emotional meaning behind it. Understanding creates safety. Lack of it creates distance.
Emotional processing of past events
Women often talk about what happened earlier as a way to integrate emotions and make sense of the experience. It’s a natural part of how many women regulate their feelings. Revisiting the moment is not dwelling on the past. It is processing.
Checking for safety and connection
Her emotional share is rarely a test of you as a man. It’s a check of the relationship:
“Are you here with me?”
“Can I trust you with my emotions?”
“Are we still connected?”
When she feels safe, the tension dissolves quickly. When she doesn’t, the conflict escalates.
Work with me
Transformation & Growth
You don’t have to face it alone. Together, we’ll find clarity, reclaim your strength, and reconnect you with who you truly are.
Exploring the patterns
We are the fixers focused on the future
This is where misalignment happens.
Women share their grief, emotions, and concerns; in the majority of cases, these concerns focus on the past. Explaining how they felt in the moment and what really hurt them. Man is on a journey of fixing it forward and not really spending much time reflecting on what happened.
“Well, it happend, it sucks, let’s talk and see how we can fix in in the future”
This helps us understand how misaligned both sides are, but still with good intentions. They might not go into blaming, defensiveness, or explaining, yet they still talk about two different timelines without acknowledging what happened. She’s trying to explain the emotional context so that he can understand her experience. He will want to move past it and focus on solving the problem by finding solutions, making promises, defending his intentions, and mapping out the future. All these things are essential to resolving the issue, but the first step is to listen, empathise with care, create a safe space, and just be. Moving forward is a stage of repair, which is as important as just being in the past moment to understand.
Because men often feel responsible for their partner’s emotional state, her feelings feel like a report card.
Black or white
The first challenge men face in situations like that is that it’s easy to get stuck on “what’s wrong,” and when a man’s insecurities surface, the typical black-or-white thinking will kick in. From a simple message explaining emotions, a man assumes that if these things are wrong, everything else has to be shit too. That escalates quickly into turbo-defensive mode, where man’s ego feels so hurt, so quickly that he can’t have a rational conversation about the problem at hand. Now it’s a conversation about his whole life, and he escalated it himself, without any help. There are now two categories, two opposite worlds, where nothing exists between them. A little bit like “you, you are not in my camp, you are against me”. Women will often call such a state “walking on eggshells”.
Her: I felt hurt when you didn’t call. I’ve been feeling disconnected lately.
Him: *thinking* – I did something wrong, I’m being blamed, I’m failing. Choosing one (or all) of the following options:
“That’s not what happened.”
“You’re overreacting.” – this is the best one :)
“I didn’t do anything wrong.”
“You’re blaming me for everything.”
The little boy inside shouts, and this is one of the best signs of immature masculinity, a hurt ego that needs a lot of healing. In general, women should avoid this type, unless they are also hurt in a matching way, which means they want to “fix him”. They are the healers who believe they can change the man, often sacrificing themselves in the process. If they do walk away in the end, men will rationalise her behaviour as immature and put themselves into a victim position.
Black-and-white thinking comes from:
Fear of being wrong
Fear of disappointing someone
Wanting to be a “good partner”
Difficulty separating intent from impact
Trouble tolerating emotional discomfort
Thinking feelings = criticism
Childhood patterns where mistakes = punishment
To disarm the situation, a very healthy approach might be as simple as clarifying the intent earlier, and that does not belong to only one side. Both people should be respectful of each other, don’t assume intentions, and when we label things early, as that can shift the conversation onto a different track. Proactive communication helps.
He can learn to say: “I want to understand what the past moment felt like for you.”
She can add: “I’m not bringing this up to blame you, just to help you see what I felt.”
Since you are complaining, let me tell you…
Just writting the above subtitle, my first thought was “fuck, I’ve been there so many times!”. Some heavy flashback and emotions invaded my body.
For a conflict-avoidant man, this particular approach is going to be very popular. They do not love conflict, so whilst everything is flowing and things are good, they won’t really bring up past issues. There is no need to do it and create problems, right? Very often, it’s not that they are actually scared, just things that happened in the past seem to stay in the past, and unless it was really hurtful, the topic feels “CLOSED”… until it’s not.
Women bring their emotions to the table, and it feels like a conflict. Well, since we are already here, a man will listen to them, acknowledge their feelings (unlikely), and before he repairs anything, apologise and do anything meaningful, he will bring attention to his stuff. It might come in the form of feelings, not just situations. For example, she raises issues about feeling disconnected, and the guy says the situation strengthened his connection. It’s not only showing that he didn’t listen but also creating a barrier by focusing on himself and his experience. They both want to be acknowledged, understood and seen, but can’t start a new thread unless the previous one hasn’t been finished.
This pattern happens not because men don’t care, but because her emotional honesty touches their old wounds, a fear of letting someone down, a fear of conflict, a fear of being the “bad guy.” Without realising it, they respond to their own insecurities rather than to her reality. A healthier dynamic emerges when a man learns to pause and recognise, “This feeling is mine, not hers,” allowing him to stay present with what she’s actually saying. When he can set aside his internal noise and hear her without defending himself, the conversation softens: she feels understood, he feels grounded, and their connection grows instead of getting tangled in misplaced reactions.
She is wrong, I have to correct her
Men are often socialised toward problem-solving, clarity, and “fixing.” This leads them to focus on facts, timeline, and accuracy, because that’s how they were taught to create safety and resolve issues. Women are often socialised toward emotional attunement and relational connection. In conflict, they may seek to express feelings to be understood and to restore closeness.
She is talking about emotion. He is talking about accuracy. Recognising this solves half of the conflict.
The need to be factually correct, and the forgetting that we are not talking about emotions, which can be very different from facts. Not because things happened or didn’t, but more from the angle that what happens is interpreted through patterns, triggers, and experiences. In the same situation, the exact moment won’t look the same for both people. So whilst a woman is sharing her story, her point of view, a man might get the temptation or even fixation to get the facts straight, otherwise they will feel this is all wrong, doesn’t make sense, and she doesn’t understand what even happened. This approach is already a heavy missalignment with the initial intent and point of the conversation.
Her: “It felt like you didn’t care.”
She’s not making a factual claim about the man’s intentions as she’s expressing an internal state and checking:
“Are you with me? Do you still care about how I feel?”
Him: “That’s not true. I did care. You’re remembering it wrong.”
This is a profoundly disconnected experience, even if that’s not the intention, which makes a woman feel dismissed, not understood, and her feelings somehow wrong.
Women sometimes play their part…
Women are not without fault, sometimes talking about emotions, but quietly escalating to what I’ve called a “character assassination”. It is worth recognising that men’s reactivity might come from that too. What am I talking about? When a problem situation escalated from “you did this” to “you always do that”.
It might also come down to communication, starting with a single problem or issue, and it wasn’t the “thing” that hurt them, but the insecurity that flared up behind the scenes as a result. It’s very hard to dig through these challenges, as the person who often brings them up doesn’t see or understand what really happened, they only know where it started.
If a woman is unable to share her feelings safely without judgment or blame, it becomes an actual attack. Often, this shaming and escalation are dressed up as “I’m only sharing how I feel,” as an excuse. Situations like that say a lot about her current state and have to be called out safely. I’ve seen both ways – from gentle feeling-sharing, which was literally that, to very aggressive escalation, name-calling, and other unpleasant things. It’s hard not to take personal stuff like that, but it doesn’t mean we should.
Work with me
Transformation & Growth
You don’t have to face it alone. Together, we’ll find clarity, reclaim your strength, and reconnect you with who you truly are.
How I failed in my relationships
One of my most important relationships in life failed because of reactivity, and it took me years to understand what the problem looked like and the significant role my behaviour played there. I wouldn’t be surprised if there were more than just one, really. When I was learning what it was all about, it started from denial, through anger and acceptance. I went through a whole journey of figuring it out, “it was me”. It feels painful to admit, but it’s true.
Amongst many challenges, one of the biggest for me was always bringing up my feelings and views right after my partner shared theirs. Not because I didn’t listen or understand what she was saying (although I’m sure it can be argued otherwise), but because I’m not a fan of conflicts. Since we are in one right at the moment, NOW is the right moment to bring my pain. As you can imagine, this never ended well, but it took me a very long time to understand what it was all about. How often my small and “thoughtful” replies were actually all about me, not her and emotions on the table. I feel there are so many small nuances that it’s hard to catch these behaviours until I give myself time to reflect, almost word by word and have a “ooo wow, I really said that?” moment.
It’s easier for me when such an exchange happens in writing, but then I end up making a lot of edits and often delete the message after a few minutes, hoping she didn’t see it. The moment I realised this message, even when I was very mindful and careful, brought nothing valuable to the conversation, or was still about something “mine”.
From many scenarios and moments when I missed my opportunity to be for another person, create a safe space and connect, one example that caused me tons of confusion was when I learnt that the word “weird” was actually a judgment of what happened. The other person was in a very fragile and sensitive moment and got hooked on it. It just opened my eyes to many different phrases that quietly imply judgment, and I never thought about it.
She: “I bought this expensive thing, and it’s amazing, I love it, my dream came true.”
Me: “I find it weird that you bought this thing and you still owe me money I borrowed you a while ago”
I’m still learning and will continue to learn for a while. But at the same time, I’m open to listening and stop pretending that this is not part of me. I care about how I speak and how I express my thoughts, but sometimes it feels like so much of it bypasses my filters. Removing shame around these situations helps bring awareness, and with that, transformation. A step toward improvement.
I only wish I weren’t so stubborn and had learned these things much earlier.
Transformation of the experience
When we realise that every time we face a situation where we can explode and be reactive, it’s essential to see it as “what a gift”. In this moment, we can pause and use this opportunity to transform these challenging moments into change for good, a new world, a new understanding. It will be fucking hard, I promise. But everything worth doing is hard to do.
Pause before responding
A short pause is one of the most powerful tools you can use before you decide to speak. Use it to breathe, ground, and let your nervous system settle. If you reply to activation, you will defend or attack, and it’s all about the intention. Does the answer you are providing serve you, or the person you talk to? If you reply from presence, you will understand and feel it, without ego.
Try “Give me a moment to take this in.”
Validate feelings without agreeing with facts
Validation is not agreeing. It acknowledges the emotional experience, and it doesn’t mean you are becoming soft or submitting to the situation. The other person must feel seen first, before you can focus on facts. You can say “I hear that this was painful for you,” or “I understand why you felt disconnected there,” and this helps to keep the conversation safe without sacrificing your perspective. Once the emotion is met, clarity becomes possible and productive.
Separate intent from impact
Men often defend their intentions as good, but they just get miscommunicated in a language women can understand. Women usually speak from impact. When she shares, it’s all about what she felt and how she received it. Both are valid.
You can hold both by saying: “My intention was good, but I see the impact was different for you.”
This builds trust instead of tension.
How to repair after rupture
Every relationship has ruptures. Mature masculinity knows how to repair them. A strong repair includes:
- owning your part without defensiveness
- expressing genuine care for her experience
- clarifying what you learned from the moment
- explaining how you will show up differently next time
Repair is not about perfection. It is about responsibility.
At any point, you have this weird feeling that you might be 5% responsible for the mess that happened, upon quick reflection, you will realise that you own 30% of what happened. Only then will you be ready to let go of some parts of yourself, deeply reflect on what happened and the language you used, and realise that it is closer to 70%. Sad, but so often very true.
It’s a communication issue
Man most of the time care, they just fail to show in the way women can see it.
There is responsibility on both sides to assume the best. To put filters and not react like rabbits connected to an electric shock machine. It’s all about believing that the other person always has good intentions. It’s hard in the heat of the moment, but it’s critical. In the end, we don’t want to step on someone’s triggers when they fire up like a Christmas light every time a sense starts from “I felt…”.
These kinds of situations reveal a lot about insecurities on both sides if we understand the root cause. And man, they need to step up their game if they want a partner who feels safe next to them.
Subscribe
Take the First Step
Stay up to date. Sign up for occasional newsletter with events, trips, circles and interesting stuff that might help you in your journey. I'm keeping it light, so don't worry, you won't get spammed.
